
to start doing what works better?

Free Agent Source is a better way to work.

You've seen those top 10, top 20, top 100 lists, and we all know the numbers are arbitrary. So in this case, we'll just jot down some key benefits, and let you add more in the forums.
For Companies Looking to Hire
For Working Professionals

A quick comparison of staffing agency relationships vs. Free Agent Source shows benefits to both the company and Free Agent:
Staffing Agency |
Free Agent Source |
| Corp to Corp Contract | Corp to Corp Contract |
| Negotiate Billable Rate with Staffing Agency | Negotiate Billable Rate with the Free Agent (like hiring an employee) |
| No Transparency to the Professional on % Agency Keeps | 100% Transparency (= professional, satisfied professionals) |
| No Group Rate Benefits (health care, retirement plan, etc.) | Group Rate Benefits (= happy, secure professionals) |
| Professionals makes half or less of what the Agency is paid | Free Agent keeps 85% or so (= content, well paid professionals) |
| Professionals are "temps" with little or no status, support, or stake | Free Agents have the support of an employer (FAS) and our back office |
| High Risk, High Expense, Low Commitment | Low Risk, Moderate Expense, High Commitment |

If we were a staffing agency, we'd probably do the usual things: hide what we're billing the client, pay you a fraction of that, deprive you of benefits, and treat you as an interchangeable commodity.

One of the toughest things about being a contractor, as usually envisioned, is that you get all the headaches of running your own business and none of the benefits of employment.